On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:02:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Just an FYI -- Martin Jansa found a problem with the implement of the > >> package version comparison. > >> > >> In deb and ipk, they do not support '<' or '>', instead it's '<<' and '>>'. > >> (Odd, historical reasons apparently). > >> > >> While RPM doesn't have any idea what '<<' or '>>' is. > >> > >> Talking with RP and others it seems like the best approach is to implement > >> a > >> conversion, in the deb and ipk packaging classes, to convert '<' and '>' to > >> the '<<' and '>>' equivalents. As well as add a sanity check that nobody > >> is > >> using '<<' or '>>'. > >> > >> I'm in the process of doing that now. > >> > >> --Mark > > > > There is still some problem in opkg, now when I'm testing << with opkg > > which should work as LESS (and < as LESS_EQUAL), it still shows <= in > > opkg status and behaves like <=. So there is probably some bug in opkg > > still hidden :/ > > Yes; it seems the right fix is in opkg. > > Using RCONFLICTS with << also fails to me as said yestarday on IRC.
Reported upstream with simple test case http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=94 will attach patch there + send here when I have it. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
