On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Andreas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Laurentiu Palcu > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 09/20/2012 07:12 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Andreas Müller >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Laurentiu Palcu >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/19/2012 04:41 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Laurentiu Palcu >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been quite a long time since I sent the first version of >>>>>>> postinstall >>>>>>> improvements which, after some debate, we decided it needed run-once >>>>>>> support of postinst scriptlets on host. This patcheset (RFC actually) >>>>>>> adds >>>>>>> that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, in order to achieve this goal I took advantage of >>>>>>> ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND variable. Basically, if running some postinst >>>>>>> scriptlets is time consuming (even on host) and execute repeatedly, >>>>>>> then we can postpone the running and run the scriplet just once. The >>>>>>> idea is >>>>>>> to put the scriptlet in the ${WORKDIR}/intercept_scripts directory. >>>>>>> When the >>>>>>> ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND is executed, it will pick up all the scripts >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> this directory and execute them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This actual patchset does the above for the gtk icon cache generation >>>>>>> which >>>>>>> takes a very long time to run on target and even on some hosts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The people willing to give this patchset a test, are most than welcome. >>>>>>> Also, >>>>>>> please feel free to review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Laurentiu >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for taking care. I will give it a test tonight and hope to have >>>>>> results tomorrow. >>>>> It would be great if you could give it a try and let me know your results. >>>>> >>>> I removed gtk-native append in meta-oe, build from scratch and tested >>>> the image. No issues so far - seems you have done a great job - >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> Aargh I really would like to consider this done but I found suspicious >>> when browsing on the machine with the new image (hicolor- and >>> gnome-icon-theme installed): >>> >>> * in the folder /usr/share/icons/gnome *no* icon-theme.cache is found >>> * /usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache is there but it has the >>> date of 01.01.2000 (have no rtc backup on the machine). I would expect >>> this file to have build host's date. >>> >>> So I checked the contents on the build machine in image's rootfs: >>> >>> * in the folder /usr/share/icons/gnome *no* icon-theme.cache is found >>> * /usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache is there but has only >>> 64,5KB (the version on the machine is 2,3MB!!). >> Did you have any chance to debug the issue on your setup? I tried to >> replicate your environment but I failed. Lots of build errors, so I gave >> up. It would have taken me more time to make your setup work than >> debugging the real problem. >> >> Another alternative would be for you to prepare a tarball with all the >> repos and configs that you use and put it somewhere where I can take it. >> It would be easier for me to directly start debugging your issue. >> > Sorry but I am occupied by other issues at the moment. Hope to find > time at the weekend to add some debug messages to see what's going on. > Oh it's that simple: run_intercept_scriptlets is not called here (I don't know what caused 'mini hicolor-icon-theme's cache)! You can reproduce that e.g. by enabling buildhistory.
I simply replaced in image.bbclass ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND ?= "run_intercept_scriptlets" by ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND =+ "run_intercept_scriptlets;" an now see larger caches for all my icon themes. But the sizes are still different from those mentioned above. Will run-test tomorrow. Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
