On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 10:16 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > On 10 October 2012 02:45, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> 1. Recipes (files) confirmed to fail with P_M enabled (need to have > >>> P_M disabled as it is now): > >>> meta/recipes-connectivity/bind/bind_9.8.1.bb > >>> meta/recipes-extended/slang/slang_2.2.4.bb > >>> meta/recipes-extended/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb > >>> meta/recipes-support/js/js_1.7.0+1.8.0rc1.bb > >>> meta/recipes-support/pth/pth_2.0.7.bb > > Lack of parallelism is one of those things that really bugs me... > > Do you still have the failure logs to hand? I'd love to see a patch > which put the failure alongside the PARALLEL_MAKE=0. It's also > probably worth removing the PARALLEL_MAKE for the other targets once > master opens for development and seeing if they break on the > autobuilders (as some parallel races are rare to hit).
We've done this in the archives, the PARALLEL_MAKE entries we have are pretty much all needed, sadly. I'm not breaking master on the autobuilder by removing them "just for fun". Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
