On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 15:37 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:28 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kang Kai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > LSB tests check file ${libdir}/sendmail, and the file was created by > >> > package lsbsetup. Because lsbsetup is dropped, create the link in msmtp. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Kang Kai <[email protected]> > >> > >> I think it is wrong. You should to use alternatives for it. > > > > Not necessarily, its not a file conflict problem, it just needs to exist > > at all... > > What if I want to use another smtp and still be lsb compliance?
The issue is we already have the "sendmail" bindir entry under update alternatives control so this means adding an alternative of the alternative which I think is getting convoluted. Ideally this symlink just needs to exist which ever smtp is installed. So I think the better answer may be to move the link to the lsbtest suite, or some kind of lsb-collateral package. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
