On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 11:55 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Richard Purdie >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 17:23 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> I like to idea of a single updating place. What I dislike is AUTOINC >> >> not being taken care in the fetcher. >> >> >> >> In this case any GIT revision changes, the AUTOINC won't bump as usual >> >> (without PR server)? >> > >> > Why do you need AUTOINC to bump? The only reason we have increments in >> > the fetcher is for package upgrading... >> >> Yes but in this case the fetcher won't change AUTOINC and you'll have >> same revision even when changing SRCREVs. This will break the upgrade >> path for people not using PR server, no? > > We're going to need the PR server for upgrade paths in future regardless > so that shouldn't be an issue.
Yes I agree but in this case this change would need to wait for PR server to be the default before be applied. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
