and to finalize the confusion, there's this from
meta/classes/image.bbclass:
# IMAGE_FEATURES may contain any available package group
which would appear to be untrue at this point. i think a better way
to approach this would be to discuss the possible types of entries you
might find in IMAGE_FEATURES, which appear to be:
* actual package groups
* individual recipes(?)
* values processed totally independently by other recipes that are
neither package groups nor recipes (eg, "read-only-rootfs")
i can see i have my work cut out for me today. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
