On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Christopher Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Christopher Larson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Shakeel, Muhammad >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> addtask do_archive_scripts_logs after do_package_write_rpm >> >> +addtask do_archive_scripts_logs after do_package_write_ipk >> > >> > >> > This will cause problems for anyone trying to do builds without >> > package_ipk >> > at all. I'd suggest using anonymous python to add the appropriate >> > package >> > dependencies based on what tasks actually exist. >> >> Uh? the only exception for it would be deb, right? > > > Yes, and?
So the first patch changing from pre/post commands should be reworked and solve it in the right way. I agree about the use of annonymous python method for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
