On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:27 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc              |  7 ++--
>  .../cmake/cmake/aarch64-cmake.patch                | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../cmake/cmake/aarch64-kwsys.patch                | 38 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/aarch64-cmake.patch
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/aarch64-kwsys.patch

Assuming these are backports (they look like they are) can you add
"Upstream-Status: Backport" to the patch headers please?

This means we can automatically tell they are backports for patch status
tracking purposes and means when someone comes to upgrade the software,
its easy to know to drop them, both for the person doing the upgrade and
the person reviewing the upgrade.

Cheers,

Richard




_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to