On Monday 07 January 2013 11:36:13 Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:15 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > * IMAGE_FEATURES are image specific, but dropbear recipe isn't > > * if you have debug-tweaks in EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES or added to > > > > IMAGE_FEATURES in distro config, then it will set DISTRO_TYPE > > to debug as expected, but if you add debug-tweaks only in > > your-own-debug-image, then dropbear never sees debug-tweaks and > > your-own-debug-image won't allow empty password login. > > > > * best way would be to patch dropbear to enable empty password by > > > > runtime config or argument and enable it in ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND > > like openssh_allow_empty_password does, see > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.ssh.dropbear/845 > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc > > b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc index aa313df..2c170c6 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Dropbear is a lightweight SSH and SCP > > implementation"> > > HOMEPAGE = "http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/dropbear.html"; > > SECTION = "console/network" > > > > -INC_PR = "r0" > > +INC_PR = "r1" > > > > # some files are from other projects and have others license terms: > > # public domain, OpenSSH 3.5p1, OpenSSH3.6.1p2, PuTTY > > > > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'MULTI=1 SCPPROGRESS=1 > > PROGRAMS="${SBINCOMMANDS} ${BINCOMMANDS}"'> > > EXTRA_OECONF += "\ > > > > ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', '--enable-pam', > > '--disable-pam', d)}"> > > -DISTRO_TYPE ?= "${@base_contains("IMAGE_FEATURES", "debug-tweaks", > > "debug", "",d)}" +DISTRO_TYPE ?= "debug" > > > > do_install() { > > > > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir} \ > > How about we ditch DISTRO_TYPE entirely and check for "debug-tweaks" in > DISTRO_FEATURES? This would bring it more into line with the other > places we do things like this. > > FWIW I agree this should ideally be runtime configured and we should > really add an enhancement request to the bugzilla for that (or patches > welcome).
There's already a request open: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2578 I'd suggest leaving the current behaviour (poor as it may be) until that bug is fixed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
