On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:00:20PM +0200, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 9 January 2013 11:42, Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 09:33, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > >> Exactly, except that it would be provided by bitbake, and not > >> constructed by each recipe itself - less recipe writing work + you > >> could count on it to always mean same thing. > > > > Everything but the last dot, or the first two components, or what? For > > anything GNOMEy you want the first two elements as some packages use nano > > releases for development snapshots (1.2.3.4). > > Ok, do we have any counter-examples where you'd want, say, three out > of four parts? One out of n? Of course there will always be need to > use variables of their own in some recipes, but I'm after something > that would be usable in most cases.
I don't remember where but 1st of 4 is also used. What about stuff like "1.2.3.4+gitAUTOINC"? GNOME is quite consistent, but it still looks better defined in recipe/bbclass then having "something" defined by bitbake in all recipes and usable only in some. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
