On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:47:26PM +0000, Iorga, Cristian wrote: > Hello all, > In SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE only connman-conf needs to be added, or > connman + connman-conf? (see my V2 patch for connman 1.10 upgrade)
connman-conf only, V2 looks better Cheers, > > Regards, > Cristian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Jansa [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:58 AM > To: Burton, Ross > Cc: Iorga, Cristian; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman: upgrade to 1.10 > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:56:30AM +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > > On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 07:15, Iorga, Cristian wrote: > > > Well, I have the prior art stand by me. > > > The same technique is applied for netbase. > > > > > > And, in this specific case, connman should be machine specific. > > > Can you please give me more detail? > > > > > > The configuration file will have only the interface blacklist enabled in > > > case of a qemu* machine. > > netbase is a lot smaller than connman. > > and also listed in SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE > > >With this change you're rebuilding connman per-machine instead of sharing > >the package between compatible machines, with the only difference being a > >configuration file. > > And rebuilding also all stuff depending on connman. > > Cheers, > > -- > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected] -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
