On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan <[email protected]> wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems
support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic
while
the default values still remains on sysvinit
* moved automatic setting of PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev into
default_providers.inc
* removed ahavi-systemd since all it provided was service files; now
service files
are pulled in by avahi-daemon
* also rebased on master

btw. there has been more merges into meta-systemd in meta-openembedded
since these patches were created I cant accertain
that you picked those too but please redo this series so the history
is a bit better for tracking purposes.
I've tried to get in sync with meta-openembedded until they upgraded systemd
to v196.
hmm that would also explain the -lrt problem that Saul is seeing but I dont.


Not quite, the problem Soul is seeing is probably because he is using eglibc v2.17 I'm running a world build right now (with eglibc v2.16) and I don't see those problems.

  I tried to upgrade but something changed in the latest version and
dbus-daemon didn't start anymore and because of that a few other services
depending on it. I spent some time debugging it but eventually I decided we
should go with the previous version and address the update after we merge.
More details about this at
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1625
but we have to fix it I think weather you merge it or not since I dont  expect
us to stay at 195 forever and especially when folks who use meta-systemd
are already using 196 we wont be able to discard meta-systemd.

It's not a question of fixing it or not, rather of when will we fix it. My approach was to have a buildable version that is also stable at runtime and merge that into oe-core. The we will address systemd upgrade as a normal package upgrate, since package upgrade is routine task anyway and we do it for all packages. I also took a look over latest patches on meta-openembedded since systemd update, and there aren't that many changes that are relevant to oe-core. Any way I'll get back with a new separate branch for review (with systemd v196).

Radu

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to