On 01/18/2013 08:37 PM, Rongqing Li wrote:
On 01/18/2013 04:26 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:56:22AM +0800, [email protected]
wrote:
From: "Roy.Li" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <[email protected]>
---
meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.bb | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.bb
index 3bde512..9278cc2 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.bb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "BSD"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://COPYRIGHT;md5=8ad8615198542444f84d28a6cf226dd8"
DEPENDS = ""
-PR = "r1"
+PR = "r2"
SRC_URI = "http://www.xinetd.org/xinetd-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://xinetd.init \
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "defaults"
EXTRA_OECONF="--disable-nls"
+DEPENDS += "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'tcp-wrappers',
'tcp-wrappers', '', d)}"
+EXTRA_OECONF += "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'tcp-wrappers',
'--with-libwrap', '', d)}"
+
Why not use PACKAGECONFIG here?
Enabling tcp-wrapper is not a random thing for some customer,
it is a must. So I think feature is more suitable
Martin's point is you can use the PACKAGECONFIG syntax here instead of 2
base_contains.
for example:
PACKAGECONFIG ??= "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'tcp_wrappers',
'tcp_wrappers', '', d)}"
PACKAGECONFIG[tcp_wrappers] = "--with-libwrap,--without-libwrap,
tcp_wrappers"
See docs for more information.
Sau!
-Roy
Cheers,
do_configure() {
# Looks like configure.in is broken, so we are skipping
# rebuilding configure and are just using the shipped one
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
