On 20 January 2013 23:11, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at diff between oe-core systemd recipe and meta-systemd, can you > explain why python support got disabled.
I'll delegate that to Radu who did the bulk of the systemd recipe integration... if it's actually useful we can bring it back. > And why are there diffs like: > - /libstemd-udevd \ > + /lib/udev/udevd \ > + /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd \ > (the later is meta-systemd). Clearly a typo from backspacing a little too much... Patch sent to fix this. Note that I removed the compat symlink as the initramfs handles the systemd udev now. > Is there some plan to send patches for meta-systemd to remove bits merged > to oe-core? Right now a lot of stuff is not parsing due to removed > dbus-systemd package. I see you've already sent a patch for this - anything else massively breaking? Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
