于 2013年01月23日 20:00, Burton, Ross 写道:
On 23 January 2013 02:31, Xin Ouyang <[email protected]> wrote:
pam modules in ${base_libdir}/security/ should be binary .so files,
not symlinks. So fix this QA issue.
The short log should explain the problem more than just "fix QA issue".
The commit log also doesn't say anything about moving libcgroup from
/usr/lib to /lib. Also isn't just setting --libdir in EXTRA_OEMAKE
cleaner?
You know pam_cgroup.so is installed into ${base_libdir}/security, this
will cause "unsafe-references-in-binaries" QA issue if libcgroup.so.0 is
installed into ${libdir}.
I will add this reason in V2.
I do not use --libdir because pkgconfig/dev-so files should always
installed into ${libdir} instead of ${base_libdir}.
Finally, no PR bumps are needed in oe-core.
Why no PR bumps needed?
Thanks. :)
- Pascal
Ross
--
- Pascal
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
