On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:42 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard Purdie >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Do we need libusb support in libpcap? What does this >> dependency buy us >> > and couldn't we force it off instead? >> >> >> its needed to support canusb in libpcap, I would say yes we >> should >> support it but disabling it would be ok too although all my >> builds >> were silently using libusb so I think unknowingly may be but >> we are >> already shipping with canusb support. >> >> I'd personally prefer it disabled, but I'd think at the very least it >> should be a PACKAGECONFIG entry, whether its included in the default >> value of PACKAGECONFIG itself or not. >> > Agreed, PACKAGECONFIG, default off is the way to go with this IMO too.
yes seems good. idea, I will try to go that route. very least I will disable it _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
