On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 17:15, Ian Geiser wrote: > Greetings, I maintain 3 different platforms with varying degrees of GL > support. Would it make more sense to migrate the "opengl" distro feature to > MACHINE_FEATURES? This way we could compensate for the platforms that use > Mesa and the ones that use their custom implementations? Thoughts?
Even if there were machine features, a distro feature is still something you'd want. There's been the idea of having fine-grained machine features for the aspects of OpenGL that the hardware supports (gl, gles, egl, etc). It's not as simple as it appears and causes a rather large number of packages to become machine-specific. What would you use the machine features for? Conditionally compiling support for a particular variant of GL into packages that cannot be detected at runtime, or something else? Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
