On 02/21/2013 03:50 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 21 February 2013 08:13, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote:
On 02/20/2013 01:09 PM, farrah rashid wrote:

farrah rashid (2):
    tcp-wrappers: remove size_t.patch
    tcp-wrappers: add socklen_t.patch

   .../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/size_t.patch     |   44
---------------
   .../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/socklen_t.patch  |   59
++++++++++++++++++++
   .../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb               |    4 +-
   3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
   delete mode 100644
meta/recipes-extended/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/size_t.patch
   create mode 100644
meta/recipes-extended/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/socklen_t.patch


This must be for Danny, please mark that in the patch in the future.

socklen_t is also needed on !GLIBC hosts since a long time now (IIRC
it was even in SUSv2).
I would just use most of the syndicated patches from debian/patches/ from
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.q-24.debian.tar.xz
YMMV.




size_t.patch has been removed in 6c418ec278335c93692c2e19ec0b7b84b471e2b9,

In fact, size_t.patch has introduced a bug in ppc64.


-Roy




_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



--
Best Reagrds,
Roy | RongQing Li

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to