On 02/22/2013 10:52 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 22 February 2013 07:11, Mike Looijmans <[email protected]> wrote:
If there's anything I can do to help let me know. Is this now blocking the
integration?
I haven't found any issues with the dependencies, but I've only tested with
the util-linux-mount/umount pacakges, and the sfdisk package (which does not
depend on libmount).
Can you verify that util-linux-fsck is no longer depending on
util-linux with this patch? Maybe I've got a confused build area.
This is what opkg reports on my running systems, with the libmount patch
applied, looks fine to me, a few require libmount1, and none require
util-linux itself. For example:
Package: util-linux-mount
Version: 2.22.2-r1
Depends: libmount1 (>= 2.22.2), update-alternatives-cworth, libc6 (>= 2.17)
Package: util-linux-fdisk
Version: 2.22.2-r1
Depends: update-alternatives-cworth, libblkid1 (>= 2.22.2), libc6 (>= 2.17)
Package: util-linux-fsck
Version: 2.22.2-r1
Depends: libmount1 (>= 2.22.2), update-alternatives-cworth, libblkid1
(>= 2.22.2), libc6 (>= 2.17)
--
Mike Looijmans - Topic Automation
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
