Today I was building an image for the beaglebone with oe-core + meta-beagleboard. meta-beagleboard pretty much provides the machine definition and the kernel. In order to build the correct u-boot (2013.01+) I had to add u-boot 2013.01 to oe-core. Whilst during this I noticed the mess that the u-boot directory had become, I think we need to have a show of hands who uses what u-boot recipes and can they migrate to newer (common) versions.

When I submit a patch to get 2013.01 supported, that would make 4 different releases of u-boot; which seems a bit excessive.

Thoughts?

--

  Jack Mitchell ([email protected])
  Embedded Systems Engineer
  http://www.embed.me.uk

--


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to