On 22 March 2013 00:21:52 Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 23:54 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 21 March 2013 16:55:14 Richard Purdie
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Going forward its going to be useful to separate build data from
source data
> > in those autotooled projects which support it. Unfortunately there is a lot
> > of breakage so for now, this starts the creation of an opt in list which
> > we can iterate over enable more recipes over time.
>
>
> This does not yet seem to cover the 'O=' family, right?
Correct. autotools seemed like the best place to start with that and the
trick I mention above with the configure checksum change is only
currently enabled there anyway.
We could extend this to other places if it makes sense although I'm not
sure how many O= recipes we have...
There are not that many I suppose, yes (Linux, Busybox, uClibc come to
mind). Thing is that the later two would be nice to have, IMHO..
I'll keep it in mind.
Cheers,
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
