On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 12:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > +Sections 23 and 24 (.plt and .bss) which are NOBITS have a loaded data > address > +of 0, but a size != 0.
That doesn't seem like totally unreasonable behaviour for a NOBITS section. What were you expecting libelf to do in that case? ++ if (data != NULL && size != 0) ++ hashFunctionContextUpdateMC (&ctx, &chunk); I suppose one could argue that allocating a chunk of zero-filled memory of the right size and then hashing that would be a slightly better fix. Whether it matters in practice or not would depend on what exactly is going into this hash and what it's being used for. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
