Hi Martin,

For Case 1, I have not tested how happy were connman, ofono, and others after 
the upgrade. :-) I guess they were not happy at all, at least at runtime.
Also, given your thoughts/observation, please advise on how we should proceed 
on this one.
An option to postpone this upgrade until 1.5 is also possible.

Regards,
Cristian

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:51 PM
To: Iorga, Cristian
Cc: Burton, Ross; Koen Kooi; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] bluez4: conflicts with/replaces bluez5 - upgrade 
real-life tests

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:42:07PM +0000, Iorga, Cristian wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Initial status:
> 
> QEmu machine core-image-sato.
> 
> Follow the /update/upgrade/install path as below:
> 
> Fact: bluez5, at this point, is not an upgrade path for bluez4.
> Logical conclusion would be that bluez 5 and bluez4 should be provided only 
> with RCONFLICTS (case 2), so that doing an:
> opkg upgrade
> would not work, otherwise, user will conclude that, at this stage, bluez5 is 
> a replacement for bluez4, which, simply, is not true (Case 1).
> 
> Forcing user to remove bluez4 and install manually bluez5 will suggest that 
> bluez5 is not compatible with bluez4, so not a replacement.
> 
> In conclusion, in my opinion, we should go with RCONFLICTS only for bluez5.3 
> PU.
> 
> See cases below.
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Case 1:
> bluez4 and bluez5: reciprocal RREPLACES and RCONFLICTS

I'm bit surprised that it replaced bluez4 in this case, because last time I 
tested this I also needed RPROVIDES (at least to keep ofono, 
packagegroup-base-bluetooth, connman happy).

> root@qemux86:~# opkg update
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/all/Packages.gz.
> Inflating http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/all/Packages.gz.
> Updated list of available packages in /var/lib/opkg/local_repo_all.
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/Packages.gz.
> Inflating http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/Packages.gz.
> Updated list of available packages in /var/lib/opkg/local_repo_i586.
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/qemux86/Packages.gz.
> Inflating http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/qemux86/Packages.gz.
> Updated list of available packages in /var/lib/opkg/local_repo_qemux86.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
> bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-upgradable | grep bluez 
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0 - 5.3-r0.0
> bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0 - 5.3-r0.0
> root@qemux86:~# opkg install bluez5
> Multiple replacers for bluez5, using first one (bluez4).
> Package bluez4 is already installed on root.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
> bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0
> root@qemux86:~# opkg upgrade
> Upgrading libasound-module-bluez on root from 4.101-r6.0 to 5.3-r0.0...
> Downloading 
> http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/libasound-module-bluez_5.3-r0.0_i586.ipk.
> Removing obsolete file /usr/share/alsa/bluetooth.conf.
> Removing obsolete file /usr/lib/alsa-lib/libasound_module_ctl_bluetooth.so.
> Removing obsolete file /usr/lib/alsa-lib/libasound_module_pcm_bluetooth.so.
> Upgrading bluez5 (5.3-r0.0) to root...
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/bluez5_5.3-r0.0_i586.ipk.
> Installing libical (0.48-r0.0) to root...
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/libical_0.48-r0.0_i586.ipk.
> Removing package bluez4 from root...
> Configuring libical.
> Configuring libasound-module-bluez.
> Configuring bluez5.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
> bluez5 - 5.3-r0.0
> libasound-module-bluez - 5.3-r0.0
> root@qemux86:~#
> 
> Case 2:

Case 2 shows that if some distribution makes decision to replace bluez4 with 
bluez5 (e.g. doesn't have ofono, connman, packagegroup-base-bluetooth in their 
images, only their own app adapted to use bluez5), then they need to add 
RREPLACES to bluez4 by .bbappend.

That's why I was complaining about "upgrade path" when someone makes decision 
to change bluez version.

On the other hand, having whole R* combo in bluez5 can cause issues to people 
who don't want to upgrade yet (like in Case 1) - one answer to that is that 
they just shouldn't build it (no bluez5 in binary feed should prevent 
accidental opkg upgrade), but this works only until someone does e.g. "bitbake 
world" :/.

> bluez4 and bluez5: reciprocal RCONFLICTS (only) root@qemux86:~# opkg 
> list-upgradable libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0 - 5.3-r0.0 
> root@qemux86:~# opkg install bluez5 Installing bluez5 (5.3-r0.0) to 
> root...
> Collected errors:
>  * check_conflicts_for: The following packages conflict with bluez5:
>  * check_conflicts_for:       bluez4 * 
>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package bluez5.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg upgrade bluez5
> Installing bluez5 (5.3-r0.0) to root...
> Collected errors:
>  * check_conflicts_for: The following packages conflict with bluez5:
>  * check_conflicts_for:       bluez4 * 
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
> bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0
> root@qemux86:~# opkg remove bluez4
> No packages removed.
> Collected errors:
>  * print_dependents_warning: Package bluez4 is depended upon by packages:
>  * print_dependents_warning:  ofono
>  * print_dependents_warning:  packagegroup-base-bluetooth
>  * print_dependents_warning:  connman
>  * print_dependents_warning: These might cease to work if package bluez4 is 
> removed.
> 
>  * print_dependents_warning: Force removal of this package with 
> --force-depends.
>  * print_dependents_warning: Force removal of this package and its 
> dependents
>  * print_dependents_warning: with --force-removal-of-dependent-packages.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg remove --force-depends bluez4 Removing package 
> bluez4 from root...
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez 
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0 root@qemux86:~# opkg install 
> bluez5 Installing bluez5 (5.3-r0.0) to root...
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/bluez5_5.3-r0.0_i586.ipk.
> Installing libical (0.48-r0.0) to root...
> Downloading http://192.168.7.1/upg-ipk/i586/libical_0.48-r0.0_i586.ipk.
> Configuring libical.
> Configuring bluez5.
> root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
> bluez5 - 5.3-r0.0
> libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0
> root@qemux86:~#
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iorga, Cristian
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Iorga, Cristian
> Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] bluez4: conflicts with/replaces bluez5
> 
> - RCONFLICTS/RREPLACES bluez5
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb
> index 3ea2f25..2e98043 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  require bluez4.inc
>  
> -PR = "r5"
> +PR = "r6"
>  
>  SRC_URI += "file://bluetooth.conf \
>              file://sbc_mmx.patch \
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ SRC_URI += "file://bluetooth.conf \  SRC_URI[md5sum] = 
> "fb42cb7038c380eb0e2fa208987c96ad"
>  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "59738410ade9f0e61a13c0f77d9aaffaafe49ba9418107e4ad75fe52846f7487"
>  
> +RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "bluez5"
> +RREPLACES_${PN} = "bluez5"
> +
>  do_install_append() {
>       install -m 0644 ${S}/audio/audio.conf ${D}/${sysconfdir}/bluetooth/
>       install -m 0644 ${S}/network/network.conf 
> ${D}/${sysconfdir}/bluetooth/
> --
> 1.7.10.4
> 

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to