On Saturday 06 April 2013 15:14:20 Chris Larson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Gary Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have run across a problem where a main recipe is written in > > such a way that makes using .bbappend impossible. This happens > > if the main recipe has an explicit assignment for FILESPATH. > > In this case, the .bbappend is unable to add to that path, e.g. > > to add a machine specific patch, etc. > > If the explicit definition calls base_set_filespath, then FILESEXTRAPATHS > can still be used.
Also a number of the examples given are using .= which should also be acceptable and won't interfere with FILESEXTRAPATHS usage in bbappends. However the ones that just assign it to a value without base_set_filespath - especially when they're covering directories that are already handled by the default value of FILESPATH - should be removed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
