Hi Koen, On 23 April 2013 09:18, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > A real patch will follow later after I test this (full rebuild going on due > to the BACKFILL snafu mentioned earlier), but it boils down to: > > [koen@rrMBP systemd]$ diff -Nurd systemd_199.bb systemd_202.bb > --- systemd_199.bb 2013-04-22 16:53:18.450910639 +0200 > +++ systemd_202.bb 2013-04-23 09:48:06.803283711 +0200 > - --with-sysvrcnd-path=${sysconfdir} \ > + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'sysvinit', > '--with-sysvrcnd-path=${sysconfdir}', '--with-sysvrcnd-path=', d)} \ > > Is anyone fundamentally opposed to this going in early in the 1.5 cycle > provided my tests work out?
I have no problem with making this a PACKAGECONFIG straight away, but total disabling of sysvinit compact code would mean mass breakage as we've not yet managed 100% systemd coverage of the init scripts in oe-core. When a world build of oe-core results in zero scripts in init.d we could talk. :) Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
