On 4/26/13 9:27 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:16 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
The alternative of course is to crease special -dbg packages for the two
conflicting items. I.e. foo-dbg, foo-sulogin-dbg, bar-dbg and
bar-sulogin-dbg...
Yeah, indeed, that's what I suggested in my original email. At the time
I thought that would be hard to arrange (in the general case), but
having given it some further consideration perhaps it isn't all that bad
after all.
I certainly wouldn't be against an enhancement that tries to match up the
binaries to their debug and create suitably named -dbg packages. The only
tricky part is what to do with the associated sources? Since those are not
arranged according to binaries, but generally for the whole recipe.
--Mark
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
