On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 13:51, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I had thought we had virtual-gconv-ENCODING providers but apparently > > that's not the case. So I think the answer at the moment is probably > > no. I guess we should add something like that. > > Agreed. Filed https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4530. > So, if I understand correctly, this bug depends on the fix for #4530 (because the patch that I've sent isn't generic enough) ? Thanks, Bogdan > > Ross > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
