On 5/30/13 11:56 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote:
The issue isn't that it's a few bad recipes, the issue is that meta-oe is a
collection of software that doesn't fit anywhere else. (I'm speaking
specifically of meta-oe, -not- meta-openembedded which has multiple layers in
it.)
OK I see that you are not supporting meta-oe in your commercial product but are
in need of bits and pieces from it I would suggest to poach the recipes and
keep them in your own supported layer if you do not wish to support meta-oe and
It would be nice if you fed back any bug fixes or changes.
Just to be clear, this is exactly what we are doing, and intend to do. Pick
pieces as needed from meta-oe, submit fixes/uprevs back to meta-oe for those pieces.
If we see a more general need we will submit them to oe-core as well, if they're
not accepted, then they go back to meta-oe.
--Mark
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
