On 6/6/13 1:09 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:


On 06/06/2013 07:43 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Comments below....

On 6/6/13 2:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
(cover letter only)

Changes in v2:
   * addressed an RPM issue that happened on AB. Interestingly, it happened 
only on
     certain distros. Our internal AB (running on Ubuntu server 12.04), didn't 
show
     any issues. So, what was the problem? We use a scriptlet wrapper to run the
     pre/post install scriptlets. What I missed in the previous patchset was 
that I
     didn't use the scriptlet wrapper when running the pre/post remove 
scriptlets
     and the context in which they ran was not correct. Hence, the update-rc.d 
used
     was the host's...
   * addresses Ross's request to move run-postinsts recipe out of dpkg 
directory,
     since it's generic now;

Paul, Mark would you please review the RPM changes please?

Thanks,
Laurentiu

Changes in v1:
Hi all,

My work at #4484 revealed that the package managers deb/ipk/rpm handle removal
of PM meta-data (when the PM is not deployed) and the delayed postinstalls
execution in their own way. Currently we have:
   * run-postinsts (for deb/ipk) and rpm-postinsts (for rpm) for running the 
delayed
     postinstalls on target when the PM is not part of the image;
   * opkg removes the meta-data and some uneeded packages whilst deb/rpm remove
     only the meta-data;
   * both opkg and deb have no way of running the delayed postinstalls on 
target,
     if package-management is not part of IMAGE_FEATURES, because the meta-data
     was deleted (and it would have been useless anyway since the PM is not 
installed);

That being said, this patchset tries to create a more unified solution for all
PM backends.

rpm-postinsts recipe is replaced by run-postinsts but I'll keep it in oe-core
for a while (a couple of weeks maybe), just in case the current solution does 
not
satisfy the RPM users (I doubt it though).

I did tests with core-image-minimal using sysvinit/systemd and with/without 
delayed
postinstalls. The results are as expected.

Thanks,
Laurentiu

The following changes since commit a62aed41f2d8f874f7ae24d0e5be5dbc66ea2199:

    lrzsz: check locale.h in configure (2013-06-04 15:55:46 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

    git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib lpalcu/run_postinsts_refactor_v2
    
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=lpalcu/run_postinsts_refactor_v2

Laurentiu Palcu (7):
    rootfs_*.bbclass: add some helper functions
    image.bbclass: remove unneeded files from the image
    core-image-minimal: do not remove packaging files in the rootfs
      postprocess
    run-postinsts: make it generic
    rootfs_rpm.bbclass: switch to using run-postinsts
    package_rpm.bbclass: handle pre/post remove scriptlets
    rpm: replace rpm-postinsts dependency with run-postinsts

   meta/classes/image.bbclass                         |   33 ++++++++++++++
   meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass                   |   16 ++++---
   meta/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass                    |   23 +++++++++-
   meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass                    |   39 ++++++++--------
   meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass                    |   29 ++++++++++--
   meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb     |    2 -
   .../dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts               |   36 ---------------
   .../dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts.awk           |   30 -------------
   meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.9.bb             |    2 +-
   .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts      |   47 
++++++++++++++++++++
   .../{dpkg => run-postinsts}/run-postinsts_1.0.bb   |    7 ++-
   11 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
   delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
   delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts.awk
   create mode 100755 
meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
   rename meta/recipes-devtools/{dpkg => run-postinsts}/run-postinsts_1.0.bb 
(68%)


+rootfs_remove_unneeded () {
+       if ${@base_contains("IMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", "false", 
"true", d)}; then
+               if [ -z "$(delayed_postinsts)" ]; then
+                       # All packages were successfully configured.
+                       # update-rc.d, base-passwd, run-postinsts are no 
further use, remove them now
+                       remove_run_postinsts=false
+                       if [ -e 
${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${sysconfdir}/init.d/run-postinsts ]; then
+                               remove_run_postinsts=true
+                       fi
+                       rootfs_remove_packages update-rc.d base-passwd 
${ROOTFS_BOOTSTRAP_INSTALL}
+
+                       # Need to remove rc.d files for run-postinsts by hand 
since opkg won't
+                       # call postrm scripts in offline root mode.
+                       if $remove_run_postinsts; then
+                               update-rc.d -f -r ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} run-postinsts 
remove
+                       fi

The above runs unconditionally for all package types.  Will this cause an issue
w/ RPM or deb?  (I don't think it will, but I'm slightly worried about RPM and
it's removal scripts.)
I believe I missed to remove the opkg from the comment since I pasted
this piece of code from rootfs_ipk.bbclass. However, during my tests, I
saw no issues with rpm/deb. Is there anything in particular you think I
should check for RPM to rule out your concerns?

Simply that the update-rc.d will be run by the RPM rule, and rerun in the above.

As long as that doesn't cause a problem, I'm fine with the change.

--Mark

Thanks,
Laurentiu

+               else
+                       # Some packages were not successfully configured, save 
them only
+                       # if we have run-postinsts script present. Otherwise, 
they're
+                       # useless
+                       if [ -e 
${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${sysconfdir}/init.d/run-postinsts ]; then
+                               save_postinsts
+                       fi
+               fi
+
+               # Since no package manager is present in the image the metadata 
is not needed
+               remove_packaging_data_files
+       fi
+}
+

Everything else looks fine.

Reviewed-by: Mark Hatle <[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to