On 06/18/2013 01:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:49 AM, <qi.c...@windriver.com> wrote:
From: Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com>
Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant.
It basically wants to do the same thing as the update-alternatives
does. But it doesn't do it well.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <qi.c...@windriver.com>
Most of patch 1 and 2 should be merged; here you should drop the
postinst and convert these to the update-alternative way so we don't
have the tree broken after this patch and allow for bisect to be
used.
Hi Otavio,
Maybe there's some misunderstanding here.
To be clear, patch 1 and patch 2 do two different things.
Patch 1 removes postinst, it has nothing to do with patch 2, which fix
busybox.inc to support the FEATURE_INDIVIDUAL.
And after this patch (patch 1), the tree is not broken. The busybox
still works as it has been working so far.
[
And I just did a simple test to confirm this. On the lastest master, I
removed the postinst part of busybox.inc, and built a
core-image-minimal, it worked out well. Here's some output.
root@qemuarm:~# ls -l /bin/ | grep busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 ash -> /bin/busybox
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 556824 Jun 18 01:27 busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 cat -> /bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chattr ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chgrp ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chmod ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chown ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 cp -> /bin/busybox
....
]
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
