On 18 June 2013 16:54, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> We might as well throw away libtool > > That sounds like an excellent plan to me. I wonder how hard it would be > to invent a libtool-dummy script which took the same arguments but > basically just invoked the compiler and linker without any of the extra > craziness.
That would be DOLT. >>Yes the .la files are annoying but they're not that much of a problem, >>are they? > > I do recall that I was moved to write my original patch because the .la > files were causing me an actual problem rather than just being a > nuisance. I can't remember the details offhand unfortunately, though I > guess I could try re-enabling them again locally and see what breaks. FWIW, I've never seen a .la break anything where a clean doesn't solve it, the problems are always due to rebuilds. Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
