On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 10:02 +0800, jhuang0 wrote: > > On 6/20/2013 7:46 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 06/20/2013 04:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:39 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > >>> On 20 June 2013 11:36, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> From: Jackie Huang <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> move libdbus-1.so* to base_libdir to kill a warning: > >>>> > >>>> WARNING: QA Issue: lib32-consolekit: /lib/security/ > >>>> pam_ck_connector.so, installed in the base_prefix, > >>>> requires a shared library under exec_prefix (/usr): > >>>> libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0xdead3000) > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <[email protected]> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> More and more and more libraries move. Do we *really* need to support > >>> split-usr? Have you audited all of the udev helpers yet? > >> > >> I have to admit I'm not happy with the piece by piece approach this is > >> taking. We're going to end up with nearly everything moving to > >> base_libdir at this rate. If we're going to do this, I want someone to > >> come up with a definitive list of what needs to move before any more of > >> these merge. > >> > > And this should be checked with various DISTRO_FEATURES such as pam > > (enabled/disabled) and systemd (enabled/disabled), not just one > > variation, please be sure to list what your testing matrix is. > > I tested with DISTRO_FEATURES 'pam' (enabled/disabled) and 'systemd' > (enabled/disabled) and WARN_QA = "unsafe-references-in-binaries > unsafe-references-in-scripts", and I have sent a v3. If you are agree to > merge, please merge the v3 one, thanks!
As I said, I'm not taking any more of these moves until there is a well thought out analysis/plan. Sorry. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
