On Monday 01 July 2013 16:02:56 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 July 2013 15:58, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Monday 01 July 2013 15:49:00 Burton, Ross wrote: > >> On 28 June 2013 11:02, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I appreciate the intention here but I'm not sure if this is really the > >> > appropriate place to put this; packagegroup-core-boot is supposed to > >> > only > >> > directly pull in the essentials required for booting. This will cause > >> > problems for those people using alternative device managers (e.g. > >> > busybox > >> > mdev) as well. > >> > > >> > I'm not sure where this should go, but adding it to VIRTUAL- > >> > RUNTIME_dev_manager (in the distro config?) could work. Anyone else > >> > have any better suggestion? > >> > >> How about making udev RRECOMMEND udev-cache? > > > > It's not that udev-cache might not be available, rather that packagegroup- > > core-boot shouldn't have any kind of reference to it. In any case unless > > udev is skipped somehow, an RRECOMMENDS on udev-cache will end up > > building udev even if you haven't selected it in > > VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager so that won't help. > > I mean add a recommends to the udev binary package itself, so you'll > get udev-cache if you build udev (and keep the existing udev-selection > logic as-is).
Right, that could work yes. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
