On 11 July 2013 12:34, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was just pondering the idea of a "meta-lsb"... > > Yeah, I was thinking about that too. The obvious downside of this plan > is that this layer would end up containing a random-looking grab-bag of > recipes with nothing in common other than that they're needed for LSB > conformance and not in oe-core. > > In practice that's probably going to mean that the majority of them > would duplicate recipes from other layers (e.g. meta-browser in the nss > case) which doesn't seem like a very satisfactory state of affairs.
That's pretty much exactly my thoughts. Two less than ideal situations, one less worse than the other (LSB in oe-core being less worse, in my opinion). Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
