Hi Saul, Ross, I think that for the time being libasound-module-bluez should be libasound-module-bluez5. We will get back to it after 1.5, when all components will be ready for BlueZ 5. On the second issue, can you please go into details? I am not following exactly. Regards, Cristian
-----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:24 PM To: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'; Iorga, Cristian; Burton, Ross Subject: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5 Cristi, Ross: There is currently a PREFERRED_PROVIDER issue with bluez4 and bluez5 and I am beginning to think we need to distinguish the libasound-module-bluez with libasound-module-bluez5. I am also seeing some areas where we might need a virtual/bluez to allow recipes to enable features in places like connman and ofono Thoughts? -- Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Build System _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
