I am not saying to fix gtk-doc-stub only. I am saying fix the nastiness of using git repositories for released and supposedly stable versions. I do not see why tarball would not be enough for those to work off-hand? That should be the ideal architecture IMHO.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]>wrote: > On 21 August 2013 11:16, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Having had an inconvenient debugging session this morning with the help >> of you, ndec, and so forth on IRC, I would propose to get rid of this gtk >> doc stub, at least how it is now. It is completely breaking projects >> causing regressions compared to denzil. We are pretty much blocked by it >> altogether now. Here is the other thread for details: >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html >> >> IMHO, there should be a way for end users to get rid of the blocker issue >> and regression. So, how about making this optional? >> > > We used to patch each recipe individually and it wasn't pleasant. > gtk-doc-stub is just the first place you're hitting problems with putting > DL_DIR inside a git repository, removing it will cause something else to > break. > > Ross >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
