On Thursday 22 August 2013 11:20:46 Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 10:07 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 22:58:55 Saul Wold wrote: > > > Marko Lindqvist (3): > > > texinfo: correct dont-depend-on-help2man.patch > > > SDL2: add recipe > > > boost: fix build when PARALLEL_MAKE is not set > > > > > > Otavio Salvador (1): > > > distro_features_check.bbclass: Allow checking of required/conflicting > > > > > > features > > > > I should have asked this earlier - why does this need to be a separate > > bbclass? The code doesn't do anything if the variables aren't set, so it > > can't be because it could have an impact on existing setups that don't > > set them. > > FWIW I do have a worry about the shear weight of the core these days as > we're building up piles of anonymous python for example. In many ways I > therefore like the idea of having more classes which get included when > they're needed.
For something like this though it just increases complexity for users - unlike other optional class-supported functionality it's not even clear from the variable name that you'll need to inherit the class before they can be used. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
