On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Woegerer, Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/04/2013 05:10 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Woegerer, Paul <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> This kind of patch is nicer to send using -M option for format-patch >> so it tracks the renaming. >> > > Thanks! I will keep that in mind for future submissions. > > BTW, wouldn't it anyway make sense to change the recipes for lttng-ust, > lttng-ust, babeltrace to the same scheme as lttng-modules ? Then we > wouldn't need those nasty renaming anymore.
I'd be OK with this approach as well; it is a tradeoff as tarballs are faster to download and GIT is faster for updates. I think lttng are changing often enough to justify using GIT; Saul, would you agree? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
