Hi Mark, On Tuesday 10 September 2013 21:04:29 Mark Hatle wrote: > Time measurements with: > > MACHINE = "qemux86" > PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm" > EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES = "dev-pkgs staticdev-pkgs doc-pkgs dbg-pkgs > ptest-pkgs" BB_NUMBER_THREADS ?= "8" > PARALLEL_MAKE ?= "-j 8" > > image: core-image-sato > > Quad Core i7 workstation... > > With all of the recipes built, and just executing the do_rootfs: > > Before this change: > real 26m2.541s > user 21m8.458s > sys 7m9.683s > > After this change: > real 14m43.436s > user 15m57.525s > sys 5m16.412s > > This is a significant performance boost when using the 'complementary' > installs and attemptonly installs. The performance is by doing the > complementary installs as a batch instead of one at a time, ignoring > failures.
This is a significant improvement, well done! My concern about not catching failures stands though, which is why I hadn't implemented this yet. How do we ensure that genuine failures are caught with this mode? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
