On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:48 PM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Op 11 okt. 2013, om 07:37 heeft Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a question. >> Why don't you unite name rules of other architecture? >> Forexample, armeb is endian-big of arm. mipsel is endian-little of mips. >> If you can unified name, arm64eb is better, I think. > > In an ideal world I'd do that, but that ghastly 'aarch64_be' is already in > upstream gcc, binutils and eglibc :( > Now that you work with them. can you find out the reasoning behind it ? _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
