The creation of JFFS2 images was hardcoding the
--no-cleanmarkers option (-n) after those two commits:

70a276509f0f006fcc269296afc3dcc88d2825e1
7c803cea58737ea0abc62cd21c3813d955f07224

The documentation explains that the -n option is
intended for flash NAND only: devices with NOR flash
need the cleanmarkers and should not make use of this option.

To add more flexibility, parametrize the padding size
as well, creating JFFS2_PADSIZE.

Finally, add EXTRA_IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 in explicit form:
sumtool has slightly different options:

 -l  --littleendian
 -p, --pad

To give an idea about size differences:

core-image-base-xxx.rootfs.jffs2     | 16496K
core-image-base-xxx.rootfs.sum.jffs2 | 22816K

core-image-minimal-xxx.rootfs.jffs2     | 6160384
core-image-minimal-xxx.rootfs.sum.jffs2 | 9879552

Patch v.2 fixes generation of sum.jffs2 using JFFS2_PADSIZE

Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <andrea.ad...@gmail.com>
---
 meta/classes/image_types.bbclass | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
index 9ead059..0def6d7 100644
--- a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ XZ_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-e -6"
 XZ_INTEGRITY_CHECK ?= "crc32"
 XZ_THREADS ?= "-T 0"
 
-IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 = "mkfs.jffs2 --root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS} --faketime 
--output=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 -n ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
-IMAGE_CMD_sum.jffs2 = "${IMAGE_CMD_jffs2} && sumtool -i 
${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 \
-       -o ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.sum.jffs2 -n 
${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
+IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 = "mkfs.jffs2 --root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS} --faketime 
--output=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
+IMAGE_CMD_sum.jffs2 = "mkfs.jffs2 --root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS} --faketime 
--output=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2} 
\
+       && sumtool -i ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 -o 
${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.sum.jffs2 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
 
 IMAGE_CMD_cramfs = "mkfs.cramfs ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} 
${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.cramfs ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
 
@@ -209,9 +209,12 @@ IMAGE_CMD_ubifs = "mkfs.ubifs -r ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} -o 
${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_
 EXTRA_IMAGECMD = ""
 
 inherit siteinfo
-JFFS2_ENDIANNESS ?= "${@base_conditional('SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS', 'le', 
'--little-endian', '--big-endian', d)}"
+JFFS2_PADSIZE ?= ""
+JFFS2_ENDIANNESS ?= "${@base_conditional('SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS', 'le', '-l', 
'-b', d)}"
 JFFS2_ERASEBLOCK ?= "0x40000"
-EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 ?= "--pad ${JFFS2_ENDIANNESS} 
--eraseblock=${JFFS2_ERASEBLOCK} --no-cleanmarkers"
+JFFS2_NOCLEANMARKERS ?= "--no-cleanmarkers"
+EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 ?= "--pad ${JFFS2_PADSIZE} ${JFFS2_ENDIANNESS} 
--eraseblock=${JFFS2_ERASEBLOCK} ${JFFS2_NOCLEANMARKERS}"
+EXTRA_IMAGECMD_sum.jffs2 ?= "--pad ${JFFS2_ENDIANNESS} 
--eraseblock=${JFFS2_ERASEBLOCK} ${JFFS2_NOCLEANMARKERS}"
 
 # Change these if you want default mkfs behavior (i.e. create minimal inode 
number)
 EXTRA_IMAGECMD_ext2 ?= "-i 8192"
-- 
1.8.1.5

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to