On 10/20/2013 06:59 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 06:48:31PM +0800, Ming Liu wrote:
In some cases, it's unfit to use "+=" in a conditional appending, we would
end up with the variable being set rather than being appended, which is not
it mean to.
Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <[email protected]>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.8.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.8.bb
b/meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.8.bb
index 79a4ad7..aad53b7 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.8.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.8.bb
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ inherit autotools ptest
RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest += "make"
PACKAGECONFIG_class-target ?= "libaio"
-PACKAGECONFIG_class-target += "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl', 'acl',
'', d)}"
+PACKAGECONFIG_append_class-target = " ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl',
'acl', '', d)}"
Doesn't using _append make it unnecessary harder to changed default value
in .bbappend?
Why not use
PACKAGECONFIG_class-target ?= "libaio ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl',
'acl', '', d)}"
at least in this case?
Yes, it's reasonable and make things easy, I will do what you suggest in V1.
//Ming Liu
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
