On 23 October 2013 09:53, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > i am still not convinced that we should treat GL and GLES with a > single 'DISTRO_FEATURE' since they aren't 'equivalent' features. I > understand we need a mechanism to say if the platforms has 'graphics' > support, and for some recipes 'graphics' is enough, but especially for > libsdl this isn't enough since on GLES platforms we don't want > --enable-video-opengl to be enabled since that is a GL feature, not > GLES.
I don't think anyone thinks that the current opengl feature is sufficient but there hasn't been a good enough alternative just yet. Are you proposing that the "opengl" distro feature is re-purposed as "OpenGL", and we add "opengles" for "OpenGLES". Does this need to be GLES-version-specific, what about EGL, and what about machines which can support multiple drivers/GPU hardware? Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
