On 11/8/13, 3:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
+DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better name, considering that's what
DISTROVERSION becomes if DISTRO is unset?
Ross
Agreed, we already have DISTRO_VERSION = "oe-core.0"
This sounds also the right name for THE default distro.
I disagree and I feel quite strongly about this. OE-Core is not a
distro. The whole idea was that OE-Core should build with sane defaults
without any distro set. This is a dummy placeholder value and it really
does mean to say that no distro is set.
We did put a value into the DISTRO_VERSION field so you could tell what
was being used but again its a placeholder.
So in my view "nodistro" is clearer about what is meant.
I agree as well. The thought back when this started was -if- there was to be an
OE distribution, it could come from a component of meta-openembedded.
--Mark
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
