On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Yue Tao <[email protected]> wrote: > The mke2fs and e2fsck commands are regular tools of e2fsprogs, so they > should be installed. >
Could the enforcement of mke2fs conflict with the busybox default install? Thanks. Hans > Signed-off-by: Yue Tao <[email protected]> > --- > .../recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.42.8.bb | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.42.8.bb > b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.42.8.bb > index 63c0057..5c78c82 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.42.8.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.42.8.bb > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ do_install_append () { > } > > RDEPENDS_e2fsprogs = "e2fsprogs-badblocks" > +RRECOMMENDS_e2fsprogs = "e2fsprogs-mke2fs e2fsprogs-e2fsck" > > PACKAGES =+ "e2fsprogs-e2fsck e2fsprogs-mke2fs e2fsprogs-tune2fs > e2fsprogs-badblocks" > PACKAGES =+ "libcomerr libss libe2p libext2fs" > -- > 1.7.5.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
