On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:31 +0800, yanjun.zhu wrote:
> When ccache is enabled, a parameter "ccache" is inserted.
> libtool can not handle this parameter correctly. So "--tag=CC"
> is introduced to help libtool handle it.
> ---
> meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.5.2.bb | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.5.2.bb
> b/meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.5.2.bb
> index ea0f7fb..d6ae394 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.5.2.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.5.2.bb
> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ do_configure_append() {
> if [ "${CLASSOVERRIDE}" = "class-target" ]; then
> cp ${STAGING_DATADIR}/apr/apr_rules.mk ${S}/build/rules.mk
> fi
> +
> + # When ccache is enabled, libtool needs --tag=CC to choose correct
> handle methods.
> + if [ -f ${S}/build/rules.mk ]; then
> + sed -i "s,^LTFLAGS,LTFLAGS = --silent
> --tag=CC\n#LTFLAGS,g" ${S}/build/rules.mk
> + fi
> }
> do_configure_prepend_class-native() {
> cp ${STAGING_DATADIR_NATIVE}/apr/apr_rules.mk ${S}/build/rules.mk
This looks like something better done with a specific patch along with
an explanation in the patch header. Is there any reason upstream
wouldn't do this?
By using a patch we ensure that when things are upgraded, the right
thing still gets done. You may need to update the apr recipe itself to
get the patch right.
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
