On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Henning Heinold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:21:10PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Henning Heinold >> Urk. Of the top of my head .. that just looks nasty. Signed-off-by: >> already indicates >> a company name, so going further than that is overkill IMHO. >> >> Bruce > > But what if it is contractor work, where the commiter has no company email.
Honestly, that's between the company and the contractor. But I'm only offering one opinion. I'm not a fan of new tags, whether or not they are about credit. Better commit messages, not tags, are what is typically required (i.e. read about the short lived "Impact:" tag in kernel commits). Bruce > > Bye Henning > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
