Hi, On Jan 9, 2014 8:45 PM, "Trevor Woerner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here > is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it > be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are > suspected of being, unmaintained? > > > meta-aarch64 > meta-acer > meta-ada > meta-android > meta-angstrom > meta-arago-distro > meta-arago-extras > meta-asus > meta-aurora > meta-baryon > meta-beagleboard > meta-beagleboard-extras > meta-browser > meta-bug > meta-buglabs > meta-chicken > meta-chiefriver > meta-clutter > meta-crownbay > meta-crystalforest > meta-cubox > meta-darwin > meta-eca > meta-efikamx > meta-efl > meta-eldk > meta-emenlow > meta-erlang > meta-ettus > meta-filesystems > meta-fri2 > meta-fsl-arm > meta-fsl-arm-extra > meta-fsl-demos > meta-fsl-ppc > meta-fso > meta-games > meta-geeksphone > meta-gir > meta-gnome > meta-gpe > meta-gstreamer10 > meta-guacamayo > meta-gumstix > meta-gumstix-community > meta-gumstix-extras > meta-hamradio > meta-handheld > meta-hipos > meta-htc > meta-igep > meta-initramfs > meta-intel > meta-ivi > meta-jasperforest > meta-java > meta-kde > meta-kernel-dev > meta-kirkwood > meta-linaro > meta-linaro-toolchain > meta-lsi > meta-lxcbench > meta-measured > meta-mentor > meta-micro > meta-mingw > meta-minnow > meta-mono > meta-multimedia > meta-n450 > meta-netbookpro > meta-netmodule > meta-networking > meta-nokia > meta-nslu2 > meta-nuc > meta-oe > meta-openmoko > meta-openpandora > meta-openstack > meta-openstack-compute-deploy > meta-openstack-controller-deploy > meta-openstack-qemu > meta-opie > meta-oracle-java > meta-osmocombb > meta-ouya > meta-palm > meta-perl > meta-picosam9 > meta-qt3 > meta-qt5 > meta-raspberrypi
Maintained.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
