On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:52:49PM +0100, Henning Heinold wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:47:39PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> >
> > On 01/13/2014 06:21 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:20:14AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> > >>* The archive*.bbclass didn't work, and there were a few problems, for
> > >> example:
> > >> 1) There were a few duplicated code
> > >> 2) There was no src_dir.org (or orig), but the diff command still use
> > >> it, and it is not easy to fix this issue if we don't change a lot
> > >> of the code.
> > >> 3) It didn't archive the source for the native or gcc
> > >> 4) The work flow is not very well
> > >> 5) The "subprocess.call('fakeroot cp xxxx'" should be removed
> > >> 6) And others ...
> > >>
> > >>* So that we have to refactor it, the benefits are:
> > >> 1) Fix the problems and make it work well.
> > >> 2) Reduce more than 400 lines in total.
> > >> 3) Make it easy to use.
> > >
> > >Have you seen
> > >http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-December/087729.html
> > >?
> > >
> > >Could you review it/integrate changes from it?
> >
> > I've looked at it just now, I think the problems that you mentioned have
> > been
> > fixed during the refactor. It won't install/remove the files manually any
> > more,
> > they will be installed/removed by the sstate. And the usage become easier,
> > just
> > this would be OK by default:
> >
> > INHERIT += "archiver"
> >
> > And we can easily add other functions when needed.
> >
> > // Robert
> >
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> does the whole thread means it is broken in dora too? Are there plans to
> backport the patches?AFAIK it's broken everywhere, I would like to have it backported to dylan as well (after testing that it indeed fixes source files being removed) -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
