On 15 January 2014 22:37, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 01/15/2014 08:13 AM, Paul Barker wrote: >> >> On 15 January 2014 15:12, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/14/2014 06:17 PM, Paul Barker wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> The new provider is the opkg-utils recipe. >>>> >>> This seems to have triggered a failure on the AB: >>> >>> | Computing transaction...error: Can't install >>> nativesdk-shadow-4.1.4.3-r13@i686_nativesdk: no package provides >>> nativesdk-update-alternatives-opkg >>> >> >> I've not really done much with nativesdk, but my guess is I just need to >> change >> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" >> >> to >> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" >> >> in the opkg-utils recipe so that nativesdk-* packages are built for >> that recipe. Does that sound correct? If so, I'll re-spin the patches >> with that change. >> > Yup, that's it, aslo why did you locate opkg-utils in a separate directory > from opkgs itself? Is there a reason they can't co-locate? >
I've just modified the existing recipes, I haven't moved anything. They can probably be merged into one directory if that's beneficial. Cheers, -- Paul Barker Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk http://www.paulbarker.me.uk _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core